Old Motifator threads are available in the Archive.
FUNKTIONAL
Total Posts: 115
Joined 11-11-2005 status: Pro |
hi
|
scotch
Total Posts: 2027
Joined 08-14-2005 status: Guru |
Re: peace This is completely off topic, I’m afraid, but I want to take advantage of a correspondent from Turkey. A friend told me Friday that Turkish is not an Indo-European language and completely unrelated to Romance, Germanic, and Slavic languages. As a native speaker (if you are one), what can you tell me about Turkish? |
billrock
Total Posts: 1037
Joined 11-14-2004 status: Guru |
Re: peace I had a Turkish professor in college, I asked him the same question: he told me Turkish uses semetic structure and syllable pronounciation (like Semitic languages: Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic). But its script is Indo-European like all European languages (Sanskrit-style grammar). |
Wastrel
Total Posts: 630
Joined 10-22-2004 status: Guru |
Re: peace
Turkish was primarily a phonetic, spoken language until Kemal Ataturk’s reforms in the 1920’s.
|
scotch
Total Posts: 2027
Joined 08-14-2005 status: Guru |
Re: peace Well, thanks for the information. I’m still hoping to hear from a native speaker.
I suppose you mean it has recently adopted the Roman alphabet, as Wastrel’s Wikipedia quote points out. (I don’t know why Wikipedia insists on calling it the “Latin alphabet”.) Not all Indo-European languages use the Roman alphabet, however. Russian, which is a Slavic language (the Slavic languages, as I implied above, are subsumed by the Indo-European language group), uses the Cyrillic alphabet, of course, and various Indian languages (which we would also expect to be subsumed by the Indo-European group) such as Hindi and Gurajati (I know some native Gurajati speakers, and they’ve gone over this with me) use Devanageri. |
FUNKTIONAL
Total Posts: 115
Joined 11-11-2005 status: Pro |
Re: peace
hi Scotch
|