Old Motifator threads are available in the Archive.
| Redhotpoker
Total Posts: 3601
Joined 11-18-2010 status: Guru |
Nikon D800
I think I’ve found the camera of my dreams, but availability is very limited, & with huge waiting lists every where I go. Plus to preorder, they all want the full admission price, $2999.95 & that’s for the body only,
The Nikon D800 is a professional grade full-frame digital single-lens reflex camera produced by Nikon. It was officially announced on February 7, 2012 and went on sale in late March 2012 for the suggested retail price of $2999.95 in the U.S., £2399 in the UK, and €2892 in the Eurozone. Shortly after the camera went on sale, Nikon’s UK subsidiary increased the price of the D800 in that market by £200 to £2599, saying that the original price was due to an “internal systems error”. However, Nikon honored the original price for all pre-orders placed before March 24, and added that no price changes would be made in other markets.
36.3 effective megapixel full-frame (35.9 mm × 24 mm) sensor with ISO 100–6400 (ISO 50–25600 boost)
Image quality
The Nikon D800 achieved a new ‘king’ result in the DxOMark sensor rating by toppling the Nikon D4 by 4 points, even though the D800 is cheaper, being about half the D4 price (better quality-to-price ratio).
The D800E is a specialized version which uses a new optical anti-aliasing filter with no low pass filter effect (no blurring) to obtain the sharpest images possible. Nikon claims that possible aliasing effects (moiré) can be lessened by software-processing in camera or external programs like Nikon´s Capture NX2. The D800E version will be available in mid April 2012 for a suggested retail price of $3,299.95 in the U.S. and €3171 in the Eurozone. The UK price was initially announced as £2689, but at the same time that Nikon UK announced its price error on the D800, it also increased the price of the D800E to £2899. All pre-orders made prior to March 24 will still be filled at the originally announced price.
I love high quality photography, and will need several different lenses for a variety of different types of exposures.
Chas |
| chilly
Total Posts: 722
Joined 05-05-2008 status: Guru |
Why u need such a good camera? what taking pictures of u will be making? p.s. 2999 i think it is still not that awful, u can try to do financing at the store for year or two… i took finansing for more then 6000 dollars at my store my self for two years and i am quit happy that i can have high end music gear now and making good music with it , but not tommorow… |
| Redhotpoker
Total Posts: 3601
Joined 11-18-2010 status: Guru |
Chilly,
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d800.htm Make Canon EOS 5D MARK III sit up and take notice, 22.3 Megapixel full frame! Take a picture, it always lasts longer… Chas |
| chilly
Total Posts: 722
Joined 05-05-2008 status: Guru |
Hmmm, well my suggestion is if u really want that camera then try to find solution to get it (ofcause legaly) because the life is top short, u do not know what will happend tomorrow, but try to think carefully if u really need that and what u can make with it and if the answer if yes then get it.
p.s. 1080p is not considered high resolution anymore, with Apple new Retnel displeys it is even more higher and i am pretty shure soon anough the 1080p will not considered as high deff anymore, because 4K Video format is already exist..
Just saying |
| chilly
Total Posts: 722
Joined 05-05-2008 status: Guru |
also if u will decide u want a camera take a look at Red cameras, they can capture 4k resolution http://www.red.com/products |
| Redhotpoker
Total Posts: 3601
Joined 11-18-2010 status: Guru |
Gigapixel camera catches the smallest details
A one-gigapixel image (top) shows minute details (bottom) of the skyline in Seattle, Washington.
David Brady, an engineer at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, and his colleagues are developing the AWARE-2 camera with funding from the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. The camera’s earliest use will probably be in automated military surveillance systems, but its creators hope eventually to make the technology available to researchers, media companies and consumers. The camera is described today in Nature 1, in a paper that includes some of its images. One snapshot shows a wide view of Pungo Lake, part of the Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge in North Carolina. In a compressed version of the entire image, no animals are visible. But zooming in reveals a group of swans; going in closer still makes it possible to count every bird on and above the lake. Researchers including wildlife biologists and archaeologists already use image-stitching software to create similar images from lots of lower-resolution files. But the ability to take the entire picture in one instant rather than taking individual shots over a period of minutes to an hour — during which time those swans might all have flown away — will be useful for capturing dynamic processes. With such technology, “when you’re in the field, you don’t have to decide what you’re going to study — you can capture as much information as possible and look at it for five years”, says Illah Nourbakhsh, a roboticist at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, who developed image-stitching software called Gigapan. “That really changes your mindset.”
Bigger and better
AWARE-2 sidesteps the size issue by using 98 microcameras, each with a 14-megapixel sensor, grouped around a shared spherical lens. Together, they take in a field of view 120 degrees wide and 50 degrees tall. With all the packaging, data-processing electronics and cooling systems, the entire camera is about 0.75 by 0.75 by 0.5 metres in volume. The current version of the camera can take images of about one gigapixel; by adding more microcameras, the researchers expect eventually to reach about 50 gigapixels. Each microcamera runs autofocus and exposure algorithms independently, so that every part of the image — near or far, bright or dark — is visible in the final result. Image processing is used to stitch together the 98 sub-images into a single large one at the rate of three frames per minute. “With this design, they’re changing the game,” says Nourbakhsh.
Super video
The challenge, says Michael Cohen, head of the Interactive Visual Media group at Microsoft Research in Redmond, Washington, is dealing with the huge amount of data that these cameras will produce. The gigapixel camera that takes ten frames per second will generate ten gigabytes of data every second — too much to store in conventional file formats, post on YouTube or e-mail to a friend. Not everything in these huge images is worth displaying or even recording, and researchers will have to write software to determine which data are worth storing and displaying, and create better interfaces for viewing and sharing gigapixel images. “The technology for capturing the world is outpacing our ability to deal with the data,” says Nourbakhsh. It’s all becoming very clear to me now… Chas Image Attachments
|
| Redhotpoker
Total Posts: 3601
Joined 11-18-2010 status: Guru |
Chilly
But thanks for the objective view points…
Though, you likely aren’t a photographer and so have no clue about this subject which you try to
Ah, keep to subjects you have actual factual knowledge. thanks Chas |
| jan bruijn
Total Posts: 4793
Joined 04-30-2005 status: Guru |
Number of megapixels is not really that important whether it is 22 Megapixels or 36 megapixels. The talent of the photographer is way more important. LOL. Jan |
| Redhotpoker
Total Posts: 3601
Joined 11-18-2010 status: Guru |
Hi Jan,
I’m very interested in some poster sized prints...so many of my subjects, get the full exposure they so deserve.
Chas |
| Redhotpoker
Total Posts: 3601
Joined 11-18-2010 status: Guru |
50 Gigapixel Camera May Be The Future Of Photography
Imagine having a camera that could take a broad picture of surrounding landscape, but would be able to crop down to view a single ladybug sitting on a leaf. That’s just about what Duke University and the University of Arizona researchers have come up with. Scientists have developed a 50 gigapixel camera, which is essentially like using more than 6,000 Apple iPhones to capture an image with the same resolution. The 50,000 megapixel camera may be more of a pipe dream right now, but scientists believe as technology continues to shrink down, it could be available to the general public within five years. The megapixel rating of a camera shows just how much resolution a picture will have once an image has been taken. Pixels are the individual “dots” of data, so the higher the pixel count, the higher the resolution. The team lead David Brady explained how they were able to develop the ultra-resolution gigapixel camera. “Each one of the microcameras captures information from a specific area of the field of view,” Brady said. “A computer processor essentially stitches all this information into a single highly detailed image. In many instances, the camera can capture images of things that photographers cannot see themselves but can then detect when the image is viewed later.” He said the main challenge for the researchers was developing high-performance, low-cost micro camera optics and components. “While novel multiscale lens designs are essential, the primary barrier to ubiquitous high-pixel imaging turns out to be lower power and more compact integrated circuits, not the optics,” he said. The prototype camera is two-and-half square feet, and 20 inches deep. Only about three percent of the camera is made of the optical elements, while the rest is made of the electronics and processors. The researchers said the area featuring the processors and electronics is what would need to be cut-down in order to make it a more practical use for everyday photographers. “The camera is so large now because of the electronic control boards and the need to add components to keep it from overheating,” Brady said. “As more efficient and compact electronics are developed, the age of hand-held gigapixel photography should follow.” The University of Arizona team helped to develop the software that combines the images from the microcameras into one large 50 gigapixel image. Michael Gehm, team leader and assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Arizona, said supercomputers face similar problems as to developing the optics. “Supercomputers face the same problem, with their ever more complicated processors, but at some point the complexity just saturates, and becomes cost-prohibitive,” Gehm said. “Our current approach, instead of making increasingly complex optics, is to come up with a massively parallel array of electronic elements.” He likened the way the optics work together with its lenses to how a computer network works. “A shared objective lens gathers light and routes it to the microcameras that surround it, just like a network computer hands out pieces to the individual work stations,” Gehm said. “Each gets a different view and works on their little piece of the problem. We arrange for some overlap, so we don’t miss anything.” The researchers published details of the new camera in the journal Nature. ICredit: Duke University Imaging and Spectroscopy Program Chas Image Attachments
|
| Redhotpoker
Total Posts: 3601
Joined 11-18-2010 status: Guru |
If you have ever pondered the reasoning, how that of a high end camera, could cost so very much money, seeing this video might help you justify the expense. How Canon built your digital camera This is a very interesting if technical view, inside the Canon Camera manufacturing factory. Chas |