Old Motifator threads are available in the Archive.
DavePolich
Total Posts: 6820
Joined 07-27-2002 status: Guru |
Most people have never heard of the Wumblies - I had the fortune to know them and hang with their drummer, the late Randy Castillo, who
|
Wellie
Total Posts: 6215
Joined 05-09-2003 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70’s
Mate, sorry, I thought you’d mis-spelled and were actually talking about “The Wombles” who had some hits back in the 70s, from the pen of singer/songwriter Mike Batt !
|
hamletmaschine
Total Posts: 996
Joined 02-22-2004 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70’s Well, from DP’s description, I’m sure I’d have no interest in the band, but that aside, surely their name didn’t do them any favours. |
scotch
Total Posts: 2027
Joined 08-14-2005 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
Another thread dredged from the deep. The name is reminiscent of the Rutles, whom I’ve never properly investigated. Maybe someone in the group heard the story about George Martin’s colleagues at EMI accusing him of disingenuously promoting a new Peter Sellers comedy disc when he revealed he’d just signed a group called the Beatles.
|
Wellie
Total Posts: 6215
Joined 05-09-2003 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
The Rutles were a construct/spinoff by some of the Monty Python team, with such classic numbers as Lucy in the sky with Dennis, and Cheese and Onions (C. H. double E, S E - O, N, I - O, N, S)
|
DavePolich
Total Posts: 6820
Joined 07-27-2002 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
I don’t know where the band came up with the name “The Wumblies”.
|
scotch
Total Posts: 2027
Joined 08-14-2005 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
A quick check shows it to have been in existence since 1923. The idea that the group might have been trying to pass itself off as British is implicit in my original remarks.
I’ve seen all sorts of local and regional groups I’ve enjoyed, but I don’t recall ever posing to myself this question. I’d much rather see a group in a small club than in a stadium. I’d much rather see a group I enjoy in a small club than listen to a recording.
Well, the “hung out with” thing makes me just a little bit suspicious.
If they earnestly and industriously endeavored to acquire a record contract and nevertheless failed, it must be because record companies judged them insufficiently potentially profitable, but there is certainly nothing wrong with contenting oneself to play clubs.
Pretty much every group breaks up eventually.
Hmm...I wonder what groups you’re thinking of? |
PeterG
Total Posts: 2052
Joined 01-30-2004 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
Well, now let’s see, there was the British Empire Exhibition in 1924, the Olympic Games of course in 1948, and, oh yes, a little matter of England winning the World Cup there in 1966! |
DavePolich
Total Posts: 6820
Joined 07-27-2002 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
Scotch wrote:
|
TheDukester
Total Posts: 3345
Joined 01-18-2003 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
DaveP....
|
DavePolich
Total Posts: 6820
Joined 07-27-2002 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
Dukester - how right you are.
|
-
Total Posts: 518
Joined 06-07-2006 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
This is a story about some pretty average musicians who did well another way.
|
scotch
Total Posts: 2027
Joined 08-14-2005 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
No, that’s not the problem. The problem is that I took “Like a lot of bands” to go with “Randy, the drummer, went on to the most successful career of any of them” rather than with what preceded it. Well, it did appear on the same line as the later remark and not on the same line as the earlier remark. I misread your period for a comma, however, and I suppose it’s high time I invest in reading glasses. Anyway, I took you to mean that the drummer in a lot of groups (not just this one) goes on to find greater fame and fortune than the rest of the group. I didn’t mean to contradict this, I was just curious about which groups you had in mind. It sounded to me intriguing. I’m sorry for the error, and I’m sorry it appears to have angered you.
Of course I’m familiar with the outer names--and Lita Ford just barely. It would require considerable effort not to know the name Ozzy Osbourne, an effort I don’t have anything like the energy to undertake. I hope you don’t expect me ever to have had anything approaching a favorable opinion of Black Sabbath, however, (or of name-dropping in general, for that matter).
I think “Iron Man” is actually from 1970. I happen to consider myself quite knowledgeable through 1973 and well into 1974 (unless it turns out “Iron Man” is not from 1970), manifestly more than most inhabitants here according to my reckoning. Beginning around 1975--having matured to an extent, I grew much more selective, but I was exposed to a wide swath again from 1979 through 1983 then gradually tapering off over the next few years. My “ignorance” from this point is not exactly “”willful”. It’s only that pop music since at least the rock era is essentially music marketed to children and teenagers, and as an adult I just can’t bring myself to sift through the general sludge. I pick out pearls when they happen to come to my attention.
Now here we have libel. I think you mean “general disdain” for the particular mid-seventies groups (and earlier groups anticipating that decline, as I view it) you seem to favor.
I find nothing whatsoever suspicious in either. I find the name amusing, and I find your promoting them here suspicious because of your avowed association with them, rather as I find Ford’s pardoning Nixon suspicious. There is at list a whiff of a suggestion here of self-promotion, whether or not that be your actual intent.
That may be so, but it can in no way falsify this remark of mine: “If they earnestly and industriously endeavored to acquire a record contract and nevertheless failed, it must be because record companies judged them insufficiently potentially profitable….” The only logical complaint you can have is that it’s banal or tautological.
I haven’t spent an appreciable effort trying to “get signed” (although some of my music has been commercially recorded by others), and I think I’ve expressed the opinion already that I don’t consider that necessarily a goal worth having. I do have far too much frustrating experience trying, in certain cases, to get fellow group members even to make a reasonable effort to be successful by whatever measure applicable in the particular instance, which accounts for my qualification “if they earnestly and industriously endeavored”. It’s very easy to conclude, however that “the suits don’t know anything” when you (one, that is) yourself (oneself) have (has) been bypassed, but that conclusion in such a circumstance can hardly be objective.
|
DavePolich
Total Posts: 6820
Joined 07-27-2002 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70 Quest, yes of course I’m familiar with Cherokee. Actually participated in recording a drum session there. I never made the “Robb” connection, though. |
Wastrel
Total Posts: 630
Joined 10-22-2004 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
Dukester
This, from a guy in a pork-pie hat playing a ukulele!
|
billrock
Total Posts: 1037
Joined 11-14-2004 status: Guru |
Re: Wumblies - best unsigned rock band from the 70
How can Scotch disregard the 80’s as ‘teenage’ music? 80’s had some of the best music in pop - depeche mode, a-ha, alan parsons project, def leppard, and so many more great bands.
|