Cathy
Total Posts: 0
Joined 08-01-2002
status: Newcomer
|
Replies to Bad Mister
First, thanks for working on July 4th weekend. So that’s how you “declare your independence.”
Second, I purchased the MO DVDs Vols. 2 and 3, and now can put a face/voice with your e-mails. ("Were those reading glasses just to make you appear EVEN SMARTER than you are?")
Third, I’m still a bit confused on the User 1 and User 2 banks. I guess my question is: Are we limited as to what kinds of user voices we may save in either one of these banks (that is, one bank of user voices based on existing Mo wave ROM and the other based on external/new samples), or, were you simply saying that when the ES ships, the factory settings have the User 2 bank filled with 128 voices that come from the presets (that is, and this is NO knock on Yamaha particularly when we’re getting double the number of preset voices, but unlike on the current Mo where the factory ships the Mo with the Preset voices and 128 entirely new User voices which User voices can be edited OR deleted entirely, the new ES will ship with double the number of preset voices, but really only 128 other (new) User voices—which we can edit or delete, because the other 128 User voices are filled by copies of Preset and User 1 voices—which we can edit and delete, correct?) but that we can delete/substitute them with User voices that are based on either existing Mo wave ROM or external/new samples?
Fourth, you also proactively addressed my next “comment” to you which was that: Effectively, with the “MIX VOICE” concept, coupled with the fact that we now have 8 “tracks” in Song mode that can have insert effects, for someone like me, who does a lot of live play you have now done two things that were critical for me. First, you’ve allowed me to have up to 8 tracks in song mode that I can “on the fly” change to and from and not “lose” (or better stated, maintain the ability to have) insert effects. (The only other way right now would be to have a Sysex message changing the part with the insert effects at a certain song measure, as I change from playing voice 1 to voice 2; or, alternatively, have a program change at a certain song measure to change the voice on track 1, which part has the insert effects assigned to it, to another voice, thus maintaining the insert effects on that track. Even in this manner, however, I wouldn’t be able to actually change the insert effect parameters themselves absent some other commands (Sysex?), which are currently beyond my present understanding/comprehension.) Second, you’ve freed up a lot of my User voice “space” that I otherwise now fill up on the Mo “Classic” with preset voices I’ve tweaked to reduce reverb (for live use) and other EQ changes and then saved as user voices for Song Mode use only.
Currently, this is how it works for me: If my band is playing a song and I have my set list of sequenced songs loaded (say 16 of them), in Song mode with the current Mo Classic I might have two tracks/parts/channels that I am changing between in a live setting (say, track 1 is an AP voice based on the NaturalGrand preset GM voice that I have tweaked certain parameters to and have made it a customized/edited User voice I called “Live Grand,” with the [currently limited by the Mo Classic to one part available] insert effects assigned to it; and track 2 is an OR voice that doesn’t (with the Mo Classic limitation of one part insert effect) have any insert effects. Alternatively, I might have a song with PF copy where, effectively, on parts 1 and 2 (all on channel 1, though) I have a split or layered keyboard “performance.” Of course, currently, only one of these parts can have insert effects.
With the Mo ES, with the new Mix Voice concept, the beauty is that I won’t HAVE to create a User voice that is based on a preset in order to have that exact User voice with all its tweakings/effects for this particular song. Now, I can take up one of those 256!! User voice “spaces” with another voice I import from sample libraries or otherwise (understanding what you said about the second bank of User voices that are “picked up from Preset [and existing User] voices"), and simply take, say, the Natural Grand preset voice, and use Mix Voice in Song mode to, effectively, “create” a User voice custom-made for THAT PARTICULAR SONG based on, say, the NaturalGrand preset voice, and...I can do that for this song X, or song Y, song Z, or whatever song.... For example, maybe I have the NaturalGrand preset voice tweaked for Song X that needs certain user voice edits/changes that are different from the voice edits/changes I need to made to the NaturalGrand preset voice for Song Y. Before (now), I would need to create two user voices—if the edits were more than simply reverb and chorus [which I can now do in Song/Mix mode]—one User voice for Song X, one User voice for Song Y. Now (soon...in October), I can simply use my MO ES NaturalGrand (or whatever other preset or user) voice, NOT have to create two user voices, and simply “edit” these voices with Mix Voice in Song mode, save these mix voices just for the particular song/s, thus “freeing up” more User voice “space” generally in regular ol’ Voice Mode (which benefits my Performances as well, as Performance Mode is based on voices found in Voice Mode). That’s just GREAT.
Lastly. . . . Knowing all this, I have to tell you...without trying to sound like a major cheerleader but I certain am....This new ES is EVERYTHING that I, personally, could ask for. No more dropping out of notes on intricately polyphonous songs. Plenty of sample/record time. Voices I already love. New voices I know I’ll love. Mega voices. Old/new voices I’ll be editing. Twice the note capacity in sequencing mode (so that I can load up TWICE the number of songs at a time that I now can load when I gig). 3-band EQ for each voice in song/pattern mixing. A ribbon controller (like the Kurz, which I always liked about that product). A heckuva lot more preset arps (which I never have fully utlized to begin with). I have never been sophisticated enough to fully utilize all the envelope controls, but the additional precision with the ES seems wonderful as well.
You guys REALLY listened to comments and constructive/destructive critiques.
And, as for the still on-going threads about how supposedly user-less friendly the sequencing and sampling systems are on the Mo compared with the Korg, I find it fine as is. Honestly. When last year I was choosing which workstation to purchase, I spent probably 10-15 hours last summer at two different Guitar Centers (not wanting to peeve-off salesmen at any one store location for too-too-long), with the Korg Triton Studio and Mo side-by-side, literally; the Yamaha “system” actually worked better for me than all the Korg touch-screen stuff and supposedly more user-friendly sequencing and sampling systems. (To analogize: Some people like WordPerfect, some like MSWord. I, personally, still like WordPerfect.) Yes, it’s a steep early learning curve for the newbie—as you might personally recall from so many of my posts to you early on last summer and fall—but this not-the-brightest-B-student “got it.”
And, as for the “display size” issue (which seems to be the ONLY thing that is left for future discussion, apart from 32 tracks vs. 16), they are really, really minor matters for now. As great as the Mo is, and it is, hat’s off to you and your team for this new Mo-ES product. Simply fan-friggin-tastic. Kick back, have a drink, heck have a bunch of drinks, and pat yourselves heartily on the back...for the product itself, and for pushing the envelope before Korg did.
Just tell your production/distribution people to get ‘em on the ships, planes, tranes, trucks and vans as fast as possible in September, so I can get one by my birthday (Scorpio). Please.
(BadMister or someone, do confirm to me, though, if you can, whether I’m correct on my questions above. THANKS!)
Best regards.
|