Old Motifator threads are available in the Archive.
polke
Total Posts: 80
Joined 08-28-2002 status: Experienced |
I should buy a Shure SM 58 Microphone for recording solo-voices.
|
Wastrel
Total Posts: 630
Joined 10-22-2004 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR use the balanced (XLR) connector. |
TheDukester
Total Posts: 3345
Joined 01-18-2003 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR ....and make that a Beta 58. You’ll be glad you did. |
mo-z
Total Posts: 724
Joined 11-18-2005 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR I second that on the beta 58. Also, the beta 87 is a nice mic as well. |
michaeljoe
Total Posts: 1460
Joined 11-09-2004 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
Does the MAudio device have phantom power? If the answer is yes, I’ll also add that I might consider a large diaphragm condensor microphone especially if you’re recording vocals. There are several inexpensive starter options including an Audio-Technica 3035, Rode NT1A, CAD M179, etc. I would definitely use a balanced XLR cable as well. I have started making my own and it’s the way to go. There are good videos on YouTube describing the process.
|
polke1
Total Posts: 0
Joined 02-06-2004 status: Newcomer |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
Thanks for the reply.
|
mo-z
Total Posts: 724
Joined 11-18-2005 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
The Beta 58 has a better capsule in it; it has a different “bump” in its response curve compared to a standard SM58 and has a tighter pickup pattern. The Beta 58 is the mike I use when I sing live, but if a venue has a Beta 87, I’ll use that instead.
|
michaeljoe
Total Posts: 1460
Joined 11-09-2004 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR I agree with Max on this. I assume Max would also agree that if you are purchasing with the intent to use the mic to record and not for live work, a large diaphragm condensor is likely a better option for you. If you need it for live work the Beta58 would be fine. I think Tom Petty still uses a SM57 for his live vocals.... |
Wellie
Total Posts: 6215
Joined 05-09-2003 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
The 58 has a standard Cardiod response pattern. The Beta 58 has a Hypercardioid response pattern.
|
polke
Total Posts: 80
Joined 08-28-2002 status: Experienced |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
I see on
|
JeffB1963
Total Posts: 71
Joined 12-06-2007 status: Experienced |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR That’s a typo. The SM58 and Beta58 are definitely dynamic mics and not condensers. |
PeterG
Total Posts: 2052
Joined 01-30-2004 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
+1! I use a Rode NT1 for studio vocals - great mic. |
polke
Total Posts: 80
Joined 08-28-2002 status: Experienced |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
Some decision and new questions :
|
polke
Total Posts: 80
Joined 08-28-2002 status: Experienced |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
Sorry, just checked the Oktava prices and they are not correct on my earlier reply.
|
keith.roche
Total Posts: 837
Joined 01-29-2007 status: Guru |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
I’d vote for Rode NT-1a
|
tmg1968
Total Posts: 0
Joined 11-20-2004 status: Newcomer |
Re: Shure SM58 and XLR
Shure SM and Beta series mics are THE most OVERRATED mics on the planet! Try an Audix OM2/5 side by side with ANY of the Shure mics, and you’ll hear warm, robust tone that doesn’t feedback as compared to the Shure mics, which are tinny sounding, and tend to feedback because they run so hot.
|